• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had to double-check, but the difference seems to be that traditionally SUV has a frame separate from the body construction, and crossover has the body form frame

    But also, that definition is not always followed and people just call the stupidest size cars SUVs, and the less-stupid-but-still-stupid-size crossover

    But for example, by that definition this lada niva is a crossover, not an SUV

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      That Lada is also a lot smaller than that camera angle makes it look. Way smaller than a Wrangler, probably even smaller than a Suzuki Sidekick. People called that a 3-door hatchback when it came out.

      But it came out in Europe, long before the differentiation between body-on-frame vs unibody became a significant cost consideration in America through our domestic CAFE standards legislation.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah I also looked it up and it doesn’t really seem like there’s a consensus on whether they count as SUVs. So I guess we’re both kinda right.

      Either way fuck cars that are bigger than they need to be. That’s the ultimate point.