• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I would have to go looking too. But, the article makes it clear it’s an umbrella anti-gay law.

      The actual answer to that question, is that they’re going to just ignore the parts that don’t make sense, because there’s no rule of law anyway. Written laws serve as something more like campaign promises, in an authoritarian state.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think it’s just illegal to “be” asexual.

        Under common law in the U.S. that type of law is illegal.