• PokerChips@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        While this may be true, I don’t understand what this has to do with a tool that peaches privacy requiring a tool that violates all aspects of privacy.

        EDIT: ah I believe you are saying that I never should have expected such purism in the first place.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I believe you are saying that I never should have expected such purism in the first place.

          What I’m saying is that Signal have a conflict of interest when it comes to Google and other customers.

        • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hey, at least their clients are open source so you know that their chats are actually encrypted.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well yes and no. You can compile a client yourself but you can’t use it with the official server, you have to use the binaries they put out for that. So there’s a bit of a gap there.