I understand the consensus at large is no, but what if they could be used for, say, administrative purposes, or some other task which, though not unimportant, might be considered trivial compared to, say, surgery or assessments?

Just a thought.

Also, in addition to whether such technology should be used, do you believe it to be inevitable in any case?

To be sure, I’m not advocating for or against it, merely curious what other people’s opinions are and why they hold such opinions on this potentially inevitable subject

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    People underestimate how important good administration is. Anesthialogists saved a lot of lives by creating a consistant process to be followed. Processes. Procedures. that comes from administration.

    • Cyril Strobe@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And I 100% agree. The problem I see is that others simply don’t see it that way: they lack that knowledge/ability to see/scrutinise that deep. Now combine that trait with greed of money and a desire for/to pay fewer workers, and you have the perfect recipe for an AI replacement in that area. Again, not saying that it’s good, just that it’s potentially inevitable.