Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

Example of a KDE dev not wanting environmental concerns to play any role, despite KDE having an environmental project:

Devs rejecting any notion of transparency by disclosing AI usage in code submissions (in direct opposition to advice from the FSFE):

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So, the broke CS students that want to help in their favourite DE while using LLMs to save time on their tight schedule should buy some overpriced homelab server before being able to contribute, is that it?

    • terminatortwo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Contributing is an act of community. Anybody seeking to contribute should take time to learn, be thoughtful, and understand the needs of the project.

      My advise to a student would be: don’t rush to contribute. Learning and being thoughtful is the right foundation. An LLM won’t help. In fact, being able to generate code beyond your means of understanding might make you a burden.

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No, they should manually code to help with their studies, like we have for generations. What do you think we did before AI? Have more time in the day?

      Its so unbelievably simple: don’t turn on the coal burning sycophant machine. Read a book or something. If you arent passionate enough to do something manually, i dont want your automatic contributions.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You make it sound like FLOSS hasn’t been able to function for the last 30 years without code plagiarizing LLMs.

      Do you think the whole endeavor will just up and collapse without using fascist owned AI?

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, FOSS won’t die without AI, this was never a possibility.

        The real problem is that the ““AI”” industry is forcing us to take a choice: create policies to deal with it, or drown in the noise. This what an AI policy serves, to filter out the noise they created.

    • Linearity@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The broke CS student that neither has money nor time shouldn’t be contributing.

        • Linearity@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There’s no classism about this. You either contribute with labor or with money. The dev team could’ve already consulted an LLM themselves if that’s what they wanted. Meat proxies are useless.