• village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, it still doesn’t tip.

    A computer can’t get intoxicated, tired, or distracted. Humans can’t monitor dozens of sensors millions of times a second.

    There are definitely still steps that need to be made to advance the technology, but it already has us beat. And it’s great. Traffic related deaths are a huge issue.

    What’s not great is who owns the cars.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Human drivers: people die due to reckless driving and human mistakes - and in most situations a good driver can anticipate a lot of dangers and avoid them. ML “assistants” getting control over cars: people die of unpredictable mis-assessments of inputs vs. outputs, and there’s no way to anticipate any danger or try to avoid it.

      People who advocate for non-deterministic systems taking control in cars are irresponsible and have blood on their hands.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your description of a human driver is no different than a self driving vehicle.

        An input/output error is the equivalent to a human mistake. And those happen far less often than a human mistake. People make unpredictable stupid mistakes driving all the time.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you think people make unpredictable mistakes all the time, you shouldn’t be driving a motorized vehicle. Because you clearly do not know what to anticipate. Do unpredictable mistakes happen? Sure thing. But they are the rare exception, and almost all the time an aware driver will be cautious about situations so as not to get caught unaware.