Than humans and even expert humans. For specific, narrow tasks super human behavior has long been achieved in many classification tasks. Like tumor detection in XRays for example.
ATC jobs are extremely stressful and complex and they have surprisingly little digital support systems. A digital system could for instance easily suggest an optimal route through the airspace based on the aircraft’s capabilities and data and other airplanes in the air space before the pilots even checked in with the ATC. Today ATCs still have to request and suggest course changes via radio even though both them and pilots are sitting in front of computers.
Using bullshit language like “super human behavior” doesn’t make your point any less stupid.
Diagnostics are a valid application of machine learning - as a second check, after a qualified radiologist has reviewed the images. Not instead of the human, nor even as a first step, because it will impact the effort a human puts into a review if they already get a pre-analysis.
Actually it’s safer when the human comes afterwards in the process to review and verify.
Please, stay dramatic, but I haven’t even mentioned replacement. If you look at my language I use “suggest” for example which means the judgement lies still with a human.
Than humans and even expert humans. For specific, narrow tasks super human behavior has long been achieved in many classification tasks. Like tumor detection in XRays for example.
ATC jobs are extremely stressful and complex and they have surprisingly little digital support systems. A digital system could for instance easily suggest an optimal route through the airspace based on the aircraft’s capabilities and data and other airplanes in the air space before the pilots even checked in with the ATC. Today ATCs still have to request and suggest course changes via radio even though both them and pilots are sitting in front of computers.
You don’t understand the basics of safety rules.
Using bullshit language like “super human behavior” doesn’t make your point any less stupid.
Diagnostics are a valid application of machine learning - as a second check, after a qualified radiologist has reviewed the images. Not instead of the human, nor even as a first step, because it will impact the effort a human puts into a review if they already get a pre-analysis.
With your attitude, you will kill people.
Actually it’s safer when the human comes afterwards in the process to review and verify.
Please, stay dramatic, but I haven’t even mentioned replacement. If you look at my language I use “suggest” for example which means the judgement lies still with a human.
So you really get off on the thought of getting people killed. Got ya, and e.o.t.