Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 hours agoPainlemmy.worldimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1523arrow-down15
arrow-up1518arrow-down1imagePainlemmy.worldReturn_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 hours agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareexpatriado@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·16 hours agos’s, don’t care much about grammatical rules, just rarely see this one broken
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoCyrus’: Belonging to many people called Cyru Cyrus’s: Belonging to one person called Cyrus. Cyruses’: Belonging to many people called Cyrus.
minus-squareqarl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·16 hours agoIt seems that both s’s and s’ could be valid here, according to Merriam Webster https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/what-happens-to-names-when-we-make-them-plural-or-possessive It’s an ex belonging to one Cyrus.
s’s, don’t care much about grammatical rules, just rarely see this one broken
Cyrus’: Belonging to many people called Cyru Cyrus’s: Belonging to one person called Cyrus. Cyruses’: Belonging to many people called Cyrus.
It seems that both
s’sands’could be valid here, according to Merriam Websterhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/what-happens-to-names-when-we-make-them-plural-or-possessive
It’s an ex belonging to one Cyrus.