• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No insurance is risk distribution. We all pay 5$ so none of us needs to pay 5,000,000$ which is not economically sustainable. What insurance companies get is administrative overhead fee. This has nothing to do with gambling.

    • tachikoma@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Nah nah nah; Insurance is like preem gammbling.

      For example insurance companies couldn’t pay everyone back after Hurrican Katrina. First come first serve I guess. :P

      To my understanding insurance companies isolate areas so if that area gets hit hard. The insurance company just files bankruptcy in the area and moves on..

      You gamble with which bookie (insurance company) you choose. You gamble when you choose where to live. You gamble how fast you can make your insurance claim. This shit is gambling through and through. And we (“The Common Person”) are getting fleeced.

        • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          If you pay, you lose money and might not be able to stay in business. If you don’t pay, they might rob you and burn down your store. Yes, life is a gamble.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just because there is a statistical aspect to it doesn’t make it gambling. By your definition literally everything is gambling which is a very small brained take.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The price of an insurance product is divided in 4 parts, the risk, the actuarial adjustment, administrative and distribution costs, and return of capital.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          No, the risk is the probability of a claim times the value of a claim. If you just charge that is mathematically proven that the insurance pool is going to fail. The actuarial adjustment is there to create a surplus that guarantee the survival of the pool.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      From the buyers point of view it reduces risk, so it is not gambling for them.

      However it is gambling from the point of view of the underwriters.

      (I am assuming both sides play fair and pay out when they should)