Google is rolling out its age assurance technology that uses AI in Canada.

Essentially, the technology uses machine learning to interpret “a variety of signals already associated with the users account, such as the types of information a user has searched for or the categories of videos they’ve watched on YouTube,” in order to determine a user’s age.

  • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is a step too far. What will they announce next?

    Google Canada starts using account activity to estimate your income

    Google Canada starts using account activity to estimate your location

    Google Canada starts using account activity to estimate your interests

    Is there no one that can stop Google Canada? Are they in the room with us now?

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I used to know a lot of developmentally disabled adults whose viewing habits would be indistinguishable from a ten-year-olds. Wonder how long before a disability challenge comes out; I don’t know what Canada’s disability laws are, but this would attract the interest of an enterprising lawyer under the US’s ADA.

    I also wonder if this wouldn’t just encourage kids to start mixing adult content into their feeds, which would kinda be a perverse outcome for a law designed to protect children.

    • UninterestingVoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The videos people watch for that are like

      very adult name and boring stuff tittle / politics stuff taxes idk

      Thumnail: “watch this video to trick age guessing (stuff)”

      Comments: stuff very grown up people say frfr

      i saw a video like that some years ago lol.

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I really wish there was a good alternative to youtube that more creators used. Peertube would be amazing but a lot of creators I follow with a little ad blocking do not share to peertube.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      People make youtube videos because it generates income.

      PeerTube can’t monetize content and every stored and transmitted bit costs money that has to be donated and the work is unpaid.

      It’s like wishing non-fat non-sugar ice cream tasted as good as regular ice cream. Ice cream tastes good because of the fat & the sugar, just as YouTube is good because there’s money coming in and going out.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        People make youtube videos because it generates income

        It wasn’t always this way, plenty of people made great youtube videos just for fun before there was any kind of “monetisation”. Sure, there weren’t the highly polished big budget videos (which would probably have been on tv back in the day), but there also wasn’t all the like-and-subscribe sponsored shit which makes the internet so unpleasant nowadays.

        YouTube is good because there’s money coming in and going out

        So yeah, I can’t disagree with this enough!

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Those videos people did “for fun” also had massive exposure, because there was money coming in to pay for the servers to push those videos out.

          Peertube offers neither much exposure, nor any money, so why? Why spend time making videos for a very few people who you will never meet?

          I don’t like capitalism or monetization, but what you want is a logical impossibility without a funding stream, and I doubt there is one that isn’t problematic to some degree.

          Places where independence can thrive are webpages and podcasts–both much cheaper to produce and distribute.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Agree. At least YouTube allows capitalist-hostile small creators a voice; otherwise they’d be relegated to 7-minute segments of RT TV.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I mean, that’s hypothetically less invasive than requiring your photo ID, and it’s exactly what people have been asking for for stuff like Steam being required to identify a user’s age. If the account itself is over 18 years old, the user is. If it had an attached debit card, you can probably assume it’s an adult. Etc.

    So on one hand, eww privacy. On the other, it’s info they already have on you and better than forcing ID.