• BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shamefully, good policy doesn’t win elections. Popular policy wins elections. Good policy is how you pick your candidates. Popular policies is how you get your candidate elected.

      If that were true then you’d never had Harris or Biden as nominees. Universal healthcare is massively popular, as is almost every other common left-wing policy - No wars, less money for the military, fix infrastructure. These are all policies with majority support, they are massively popular.
      Politicians get picked by an oligarchic elite that then manipulates the minority of the electorate who isn’t completely checked out or alienated from voting, into voting for their capitalist stooge. Anytime an actual popular candidate appears to get traction they are immediately hamstrung and sabotaged. This is not a bug but a feature of the democratic party and the larger duopolitic structure that masquerades as a “democracy”.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And, this is crucial, I really need the non voters to listen to this:

      We can all influence how popular a policy is

      • neatchee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Exactly. People tend to be a bit myopic on the left. They struggle to look beyond their distaste for specific parts of specific people to see the ideal strategy for change.

        Republicans get this in spades. Your campaign rhetoric is virtually irrelevant after the primaries beyond its value in securing votes. Securing state and local government control is critical if you want to protect (or disenfranchise) a specific voting bloc.

        We’re so busy eating our own for not being good enough that we just end up losing.

        I’m aggressively progressive - I support reparations, reducing funding of police in favor of mental health care, free health care for all, UBI, etc - but holy shit does the left have no clue how to achieve their goals.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          UBI is cool, but I recently watched some videos by Hazel Thayer that advocate for Universal Basic Services instead. Basically, if you give people UBI that covers the cost of rent, you’re putting money in landlords’ pockets. And I hate landlords! Guaranteeing free social housing for everyone would fix that problem. We should have basic housing, basic food, basic medicine, basic education, basic clothes, basic electricity.

          UBI is cool because it’s easy to implement in policy overnight. It would take one single bill to do it. But UBS is a recipe for a better society, with less wealth going to capitalists.

          • neatchee@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Valid argument and probably correct. You’ve certainly nailed the appeal of UBI vs UBS.

            The only thing I’d consider “better” about UBI is some amount of discretionary spending and choice

            I might be be happy living in a shoebox apartment in NYC and keeping extra money for food or entertainment, while you might prefer a nicer apartment with simple food and your existing library of books.