Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I’d love to know what NASA has planned for it.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They fired all the people who knew how to build shit and now they are desperately sending a bunch of newbies to “reverse engineer” the plane and try to figure out how it works. /s

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I mean, it’s not that old of an airframe. I’m only middle aged and I saw the last time it flew in 1991. My dad just retired from the FAA a couple years ago and when he was in the military he maintained the flight suits for the SR71 and U2 programs.

        The original engineers may have passed, but the crew and engineers responsible for the huge amount of maintenance for the airframe are still around and probably have more functional knowledge about the airframe than the designers.

        Edit: 1999 not 1991.

      • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So Space Cowboys 2, except

        • Everybody passes the physicals just fine, but all decide to quit instead of going through the onboarding process
        • The young punk bad guys in the movie are secretly trying to get an LLM to redesign it, but can’t because the Blackbird was a skunkworks program and some key principal either never got written down or DOGE cut the funding to restore the microfiche with the details so all the details got destroyed
    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Based on their work on the X-59, I wonder if they just want to collect sensor data on its sonic boom characteristics, and feed that into a model for sonic booms.

      They don’t need to be able to build something in order to be able to learn something from that thing in operation.

      • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah but what everyone forgets is that knowledge can be relearned if you do it right.

        And the issue of Fogbank was eventually solved by having modern day scientist study the problem (it was something like contamination of boron being used to make the fogbank material.)

        The SR71 could be manufactured today if we wanted to. It wasn’t built with some magical spells that are forever lost to history. There are more people alive now that know how to machine titanium than there were when they built them originally. Its just a matter of investment in the labor and tooling to make them again, which probably isn’t worth it which is why they’ll keep flying the remaining planes.

        One of the worse internet “I’m smart” thoughts is that “we’ve lost the ability to make insert outdated item because all that talent is dead.” Ok, so retrain new talent like every generation has to do anyways and maybe next time don’t pinch pennies and shutdown the factory with all these gods of manufacturing, instead bring in apprentices and have them learn from these masters.

        But what about the profit margins and the shareholders?!?!? PE firms can’t milk successful companies to death for $$$$ if they actually invest in talent.