I don’t care much about 2nm, but this one probably runs an OS that’s miles more complex than whatever the original ran. Still I’d be curious about its battery life.
BTW those batteries are replaceable so you can actually test that part.
But it doesn’t have the buttons. Sure the shape slightly resembles it, but even that’s not complete, it’s thinner and wider for some reason. The cover doesn’t feel the same, it’s slick and not matte.
There’s just such little resemblance to the original in it’s key features that it’s more of a Temu copy than something worthy of carrying it’s name.
It runs Android, so it’s just as hackable and vulnerable to authoritarian systems as any other smart phone.
Now if it was a true feature phone… good luck sideloading spyware. You’d have to disassemble the phone and mount the chips in an EEPROM reader to get anywhere, and that’s not an effective remote exploit.
Now if it was a true feature phone… good luck sideloading spyware. You’d have to disassemble the phone and mount the chips in an EEPROM reader to get anywhere, and that’s not an effective remote exploit.
that’s dumb. it’s very likely just as vulnerable as androids. the modem’s software is full of decades legacy cruft and many security holes, and likely not properly separated from the mic, the ram or the storage
No, it doesn’t run Android. Did you not read the introduction of the article?
I have a MRE Nokia phone, that can run a kind of ELF apps. There is no permission system so even worse than Android. At least apps can’t run in the background so they can only exfiltrate SMSs and unconsensual photos when open, and the latter takes ages over EDGE…
A reboot has existed since 2017.
I don’t care much about 2nm, but this one probably runs an OS that’s miles more complex than whatever the original ran. Still I’d be curious about its battery life.
BTW those batteries are replaceable so you can actually test that part.
Except that phone is utter shit and has nothing to do with the original one except the name.
Meaningless hate aside,
It has the form factor and the buttons. Being different inside was the whole point.
But you probably couldn’t use it as a bottle opener.
Actual dumbphones are also sold by the company that bears the name of the original Nokia, but I guess you hate those too.
Your username really checks out.
But it doesn’t have the buttons. Sure the shape slightly resembles it, but even that’s not complete, it’s thinner and wider for some reason. The cover doesn’t feel the same, it’s slick and not matte.
There’s just such little resemblance to the original in it’s key features that it’s more of a Temu copy than something worthy of carrying it’s name.
You really really hate the new 3310. To the point that you’re inventing adversaries where there are none.
Your link is broken.
Here is the one I think you mean, based on context and such.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_3310_(2017)
It runs Android, so it’s just as hackable and vulnerable to authoritarian systems as any other smart phone.
Now if it was a true feature phone… good luck sideloading spyware. You’d have to disassemble the phone and mount the chips in an EEPROM reader to get anywhere, and that’s not an effective remote exploit.
that’s dumb. it’s very likely just as vulnerable as androids. the modem’s software is full of decades legacy cruft and many security holes, and likely not properly separated from the mic, the ram or the storage
It’s cute you think they need to hack the OS get access to your phone.
No, it doesn’t run Android. Did you not read the introduction of the article?
I have a MRE Nokia phone, that can run a kind of ELF apps. There is no permission system so even worse than Android. At least apps can’t run in the background so they can only exfiltrate SMSs and unconsensual photos when open, and the latter takes ages over EDGE…