Just imagine the 3310 with 2nm technology and a modern battery that fills up the then available space. It would run forever™

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    BTW, proper dumbphones still exist these days. They don’t release flagships every year so there’s little to report on, but they’re being produced and sold.

    Many of them even bear the name NOKIA but have little to do with the original.

    An important aspect to consider here is the networks - the original 3310 had - at most - 2G.

    Most countries are shutting their 2G and 3G networks down these days.

    I wonder how that affects telephony capabilties of both old and new dumbphones.

    • LazyGit@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, that is the right question. I do not care about data, but can we seriously still use voice and text (gsm?) in modern networks?

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        TBH I forgot that I had this discussion elsewhere and I’m about 99% sure that these phones simply become unusable when 2G is shut down, which is why some countries shut down 3G but not 2G. But I don’t remember or understand the technical stuff behind it.

        There’s also somehing about these specs that we just call 2G or 3G etc., in reality it’s much more complex.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    A reboot has existed since 2017.

    I don’t care much about 2nm, but this one probably runs an OS that’s miles more complex than whatever the original ran. Still I’d be curious about its battery life.

    BTW those batteries are replaceable so you can actually test that part.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Meaningless hate aside,

        has nothing to do with the original one except the name.

        It has the form factor and the buttons. Being different inside was the whole point.

        But you probably couldn’t use it as a bottle opener.

        Actual dumbphones are also sold by the company that bears the name of the original Nokia, but I guess you hate those too.

        Your username really checks out.

        • rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          But it doesn’t have the buttons. Sure the shape slightly resembles it, but even that’s not complete, it’s thinner and wider for some reason. The cover doesn’t feel the same, it’s slick and not matte.

          There’s just such little resemblance to the original in it’s key features that it’s more of a Temu copy than something worthy of carrying it’s name.

          • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You really really hate the new 3310. To the point that you’re inventing adversaries where there are none.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It runs Android, so it’s just as hackable and vulnerable to authoritarian systems as any other smart phone.

        Now if it was a true feature phone… good luck sideloading spyware. You’d have to disassemble the phone and mount the chips in an EEPROM reader to get anywhere, and that’s not an effective remote exploit.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Now if it was a true feature phone… good luck sideloading spyware. You’d have to disassemble the phone and mount the chips in an EEPROM reader to get anywhere, and that’s not an effective remote exploit.

          that’s dumb. it’s very likely just as vulnerable as androids. the modem’s software is full of decades legacy cruft and many security holes, and likely not properly separated from the mic, the ram or the storage

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          No, it doesn’t run Android. Did you not read the introduction of the article?

          I have a MRE Nokia phone, that can run a kind of ELF apps. There is no permission system so even worse than Android. At least apps can’t run in the background so they can only exfiltrate SMSs and unconsensual photos when open, and the latter takes ages over EDGE…

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    A big difference would be the radio hardware. The 2G GSM radio had a huge Tx output. It was about 2 watts. 5G NR is 0.2 watts.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You could have a phone that did what that phone does that has the form factor of an iPhone that would last at least 2.5 weeks with near constant use.

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      modern tech would bring DLSS and PathTracing into snake which would allow it to run at well over 60FPS (with 6x frame gen)

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a job testing games on feature phones. I’ve played so much snakes in my life on a number pad.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if the more modern mobile network protocols require slightly more power than the 2-3G of old. It’s probably a rounding error; it would run forever™ minus an hour or so.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Thanks for bringing this up. Most places - even Finland where I still saw original 3310’s in use a few years ago - are shutting these networks down. The 3310 did not have 3G btw. I don’t think they even called whatever it had 2G back then.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not just slightly more power. A lot more power.

      Mind you, performance went through the roof compared to 2/3G. Performance per watt went up. But to get that sweet 200-600Mbps wireless, you need more power. More uptime on the modem.

      A phone from 25 years ago would “stay connected” to the network but idle the modem or even shut down higher functionalities beyond the standard connection ping. A modern phone is CONSTANTLY streaming data. Push notifications. Optimised download of music, syncing of photos, emails, chat messages for your 74 different apps in their different protocols. There’s no built in protocol to optimise a specific channel (SMS/MMS/RCS usage is considerably lower than iMessage, WhatsApp, Messenger, Viber, Telegram, etc.).

      All that creep uses up resources. And unfortunately, the Windows Phone approach of designing for the lowest common denominator, with sane background task rules etc., went out the window around 2014 (even on desktop).

      All of this combined makes a modern 3310 nigh impossible.

      Or, you can have it, but it’s not a phone worth having, because all it will be able to do is call, send text messages, and maybe have a basic browser built in…

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        A phone from 25 years ago would “stay connected” to the network but idle the modem or even shut down higher functionalities beyond the standard connection ping. A modern phone is CONSTANTLY streaming data. Push notifications. Optimised download of music, syncing of photos, emails, chat messages for your 74 different apps in their different protocols.

        you have lost the point. the point is not all that apps. the question was about the bare minimum needed for voice over 3G/4G. no push notifications, no music streaming, no apps of any kind. calls, and sms

        All of this combined makes a modern 3310 nigh impossible.

        does not. a 3310 was not an entertainment center, and a recreation of it wouldn’t either.

        Or, you can have it, but it’s not a phone worth having, because all it will be able to do is call, send text messages, and maybe have a basic browser built in…

        that’s the whole point

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Those devices already exist tho. You can buy dumb/featurephones already. They exist with modern hardware and can last 2-4 weeks…

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, a Nokia style phone would not need all this permanent movement of data. That is basically the point of such a device. Just Phonebook, phone, SMS, clock, alarm. But no Facebook, browser, Instagram, YouTube, photos and videos.

        Optionally, a simple camera that only stores locally, and uploads to the PC via USB, and/or a simple MP3 player, also to be fed via USB. No cloud stuff, no network.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds a lot like the minimal phones that exist these days. Some of them really just call and text. Some are a bit nicer since they have navigation and a simple distraction free browser.

        If you were to use only 2G and disable mobile data, it should last several days.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            And that’s why this whole idea is getting increasingly unrealistic. The world has moved on, and there’s no going back. But in theory, it should still be possible to get amazing battery life with modern chips and batteries. You would also need to change the phone grid to make that dream fully come true.

  • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A have a few years old cheap android phone whose only job is to use a couple apps that refuse to work on LineageOS. I charge it every couple weeks. No sim, but constantly connected to wifi.