Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 15 hours agopoliticlemmy.worldimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1170arrow-down116
arrow-up1154arrow-down1imagepoliticlemmy.worldReturn_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 15 hours agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·13 hours agobecause they’re in the middle, mostly in the bottom of their image, and looking right
minus-squareDeme@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoThat just depends on how the axes are set. I could see it being the case that the centre is defined by the current status quo, which neoliberalism definitely is.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours ago…neolibs are the square right and down from the center
minus-squareDeme@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours ago…and that makes them as close to the centre as any of the other three squares closest to the centre.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoyeeeees but the goodboy in the goodboy picture has more of his mass below the horizontal centre line and he is looking towards the right. ergo…
because they’re in the middle, mostly in the bottom of their image, and looking right
Nah
That just depends on how the axes are set. I could see it being the case that the centre is defined by the current status quo, which neoliberalism definitely is.
…neolibs are the square right and down from the center
…and that makes them as close to the centre as any of the other three squares closest to the centre.
yeeeees but the goodboy in the goodboy picture has more of his mass below the horizontal centre line and he is looking towards the right. ergo…