• BauerBender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The technology to eradicate homelessness, hunger, war, climate change, and Cap’n Crunch cereal all exist too, but I don’t see anyone addressing those either.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 minutes ago

      To even suggest someone commits violence against a wholesome cereal whose sole purpose is to rip up the mouths of young children is pure blasphemy.

      Can someone report this guy!? It looks like we may have another Cereal Killer on the loose. /s

    • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They eat other things as well. Supposedly mosquitoes are pretty much the only living thing that’s completely useless, and can be eradicated with no ill effects.

      • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        If I recall correctly mosquito larve are incredible water filters and are responsible for maintaining water quality in many types of wetlands.

    • Sasha [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They don’t really control mosquito populations that much. Dragon flies prefer fresh permanent bodies of water (I think usually flowing too), whereas mosquito larvae inhabit stagnant pools.

  • chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It shouldn’t have to take fifteen years to deploy effective products that can save lives

    this is such a reductionist view.

    it should absolutely take decades to make a sweeping decision to fundamentally alter an ecosystem. nobody likes disease or even getting a random bite. i grew up in the swamps of the US, i know. but we should absolutely know what we’re doing to release a genetically engineered or bacterial sterilizing agent into a naturally evolved ecosystem.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Ok. You can take decades if you have a systematic plan with data collection, time lines, expanded test beds, and reviews of emerging relevant science. But sitting on your hands for 15yrs isn’t very productive.

      People have been more than happy to do this with the food we eat under accelerated time lines (I’m not defending that, but it’s not like there isn’t precedent for genetic meddling at scale.

      • chrash0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        they did mention doing harmonization studies, which is my biggest worry: cascading ecological effects.

        the impetus can’t be “oh well they haven’t done the full studies so i guess we just full send and see what happens”.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      These techniques are targeted at individual species, not all mosquitoes, and the species in question are invasive species. If it was targeting native mosquitoes your comment would make more sense, but in this case the ecological effects should be neutral to positive.

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Careful. Targeted bacteriological or viral methods can adapt once out in the open. What you ultimately cause may not be what was intended. What other creatures share traits that might be susceptible? Let’s not pretend we’ve genomapped and understood everything out there.

        Also mosquitos and their larvae are food for parts of the food web. If they are gone, what starves?

        Unintended consequences are a real risk. Careful study should be required.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There’s a large difference between 15 years of science to make sure something doesn’t do more harm than it prevents, and taking a decade before someone even declares themselves as responsible for evaluating anything.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    so yeah. genociding species tends not to end well. That being said we actually just need to eliminate the disease spreading mosquitos and don’t need to get rid of them all so. maybe.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      These technologies are pretty much unable to completely genocide mosquitos unless deployed worldwide in an massive effort, which noone wants to actually do - they are really only problematic in areas where mosquitos and blood-borne diseases which get transmitted by them happen to coexist.

  • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    A system to kill a fuck ton with lasers has existed for decades, but a patent troll is sitting on it.

  • PMP@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Mosquitoes are my mortal enemy, unless someone can prove their eradication will disrupt the food chain so much that great white sharks will disappear … Push play already.