Idiocracy, here we come.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      51 minutes ago

      it’s not excuses, just (informed) theories about material conditions that could lead to this

      what’s your explanation for this? genuinely curious

      i’m kinda doubtful that the blanket “technology = bad” thesis in the article is true, honestly. i’m obviously not a neuroscientist but it seems super reductive and simplistic to me, and altho i believe that yes reliance on short-form content and ai summaries isn’t good for your attention span, that’s 1. not the same thing as intelligence and 2. faaaaar from being exclusive to gen z (or gen alpha for that matter). look at any older person with a phone and you’ll see it. my parents waste a ton of time on the glowing rectangle too and they treat the google summary like the gospel

      • Pratai@piefed.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        Check the other comments. Someone posted links from better sources that cite the actual studies. You may not like the results, but that doesn’t make them less true.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          This has a ring of “it’s not racist if it’s true”. The people aren’t different, they were dealt a different hand. Nobody is disputing that the studies, which probably just measure test scores, are incorrect.