Yeah but that’s the point it’s an arbitrary distinction. People somewhere make an arbitrary distinction about what people can and cannot do.
The gun nuts would go mad if the Constitution were changed but only because it’s an inconvenience to themselves. If the Constitution said you couldn’t have guns and it were changed so you could, they’d be all for that. So it’s not actually about the Constitution, it’s mostly about themselves.
So freedom of speech or assembly is arbitrary? Regardless, it is still a fact that the constitution does not grant an inalienable right to recreational drugs, making this a false equivalency. You can’t dispute that.
Seems like a false equivalency as the constitution doesn’t grant an inalienable right to recreational drugs
Yeah but that’s the point it’s an arbitrary distinction. People somewhere make an arbitrary distinction about what people can and cannot do.
The gun nuts would go mad if the Constitution were changed but only because it’s an inconvenience to themselves. If the Constitution said you couldn’t have guns and it were changed so you could, they’d be all for that. So it’s not actually about the Constitution, it’s mostly about themselves.
So freedom of speech or assembly is arbitrary? Regardless, it is still a fact that the constitution does not grant an inalienable right to recreational drugs, making this a false equivalency. You can’t dispute that.