ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoFr*ncelemmy.worldimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1225arrow-down157
arrow-up1168arrow-down1imageFr*ncelemmy.worldZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·2 days agoWhile that may be true, teachers having relations with minor pupils is generally rife for abuse.
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·22 hours agoI missed the “having relations with minor pupils” part sorry.
minus-squareJax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·16 hours agoGrooming. Look it up. Grooming doesn’t immediately involve sex.
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·15 hours agoHe was already over the French age of consent when he met her.
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 hours agoThat’s true, but “grooming” is a question of morality. it’s a specific term involving people are under the age of consent. It’s not “grooming” just because you find the relationship immoral.
While that may be true, teachers having relations with minor pupils is generally rife for abuse.
I missed the “having relations with minor pupils” part sorry.
Grooming. Look it up. Grooming doesn’t immediately involve sex.
He was already over the French age of consent when he met her.
Legal ≠ moral.
That’s true, but “grooming” is a question of morality. it’s a specific term involving people are under the age of consent. It’s not “grooming” just because you find the relationship immoral.