GoodBearComics | website

Transcript

4 Panel Comic

Panel 1: Ron Weasley sits in front of a fireplace with a Gameboy Yellow with Pokémon Red in hand.

Ron: Harry, these muggle games are so fun!

Panel 2: Harry Potter sits across the fireplace from Ron and holds his wand and a Gameboy Red with the screen and wand pointing at Ron.

Potter: Ron, look! My Pokémon is evolving from Abra to Kadabra!

Panel 3: Harry is horrified as magic flies from his wand

Panel 4: Harry comes to the depressing realization of what he’s done.

  • TheEntity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    As much as I loathe the author and mundanely feel indifferent towards the franchise, I can’t agree. It makes me think of H.P. Lovecraft who was far more problematic and yet I wouldn’t want his works to be lost. Granted, he was poor during his lifetime, so he didn’t spread his hate as much, but that’s besides the point.

    If anything let’s keep infringing on her IP!

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lovecraft is dead, meaning he can’t hurt anyone. Rowling actively uses the money she makes off the franchise to hurt people, and even the most indirect forms of advertisement for her IP ultimately help her profit and then use those profits to do harm.

      • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can’t use that excuse, it’s like saying hitler is dead so I can enjoy his art. Please so not let your need to be right to obfuscate what’s moral.

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          J.K. Rowling is alive and doing active harm with the money she makes. And if you financially support her, whether directly or indirectly, you are helping her do harm.

        • starik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          If Hitler created any great art, it would be okay to acknowledge that. He famously didn’t, though.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We can enjoy her work like Lovecraft’s when she’s as dead as Lovecraft.

      If you want to make that day come sooner, then support your local trans community! Together we can give JK Rowling a stroke!

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lovecraft was possibly the only instance where it legitimately was fear driving his xenophobia and not hatred. The man was completely and irrationally terrified of everything from air conditioners to mathematics that wasnt on a 2d plane to black people and eventually learned later in life that what scared him previously wasn’t actually scary.

      He also wasn’t a billionaire actively throwing his money and notoriety behind hate groups specifically swaying legislation and public opinion to bring harm to people.

    • Perky@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      The difference is that Lovecraft is dead and no longer benefits from any sales or attention. JKR is, unfortunately, still alive and actively spreading as much misery as possible. Considering that there’s a massive advertising push for the new show, we don’t need to do their marketing for them by also spreading comics.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Where did you hear this?

        Lovecraft never made very much money, he was always poor and he died poor.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Was Lovecraft really more problematic? I heard he was racist, but did he become the equivalent of a billionaire from his works, and use those proceeds to fuel more hate?

    • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      that’s besides the point

      I don’t think it is. Giving money to Rowling, directly or indirectly, is to hurt our trans siblings. Buying The Call of Cthulhu won’t do that.

    • CobraCommander@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      H.P. Lovecraft never funded campaigns that made the state strip the rights of non-white people.

      He is nowhere near more problematic, JK actively hurts people and is 100% responsible for trans deaths.