Not true. It create independent train of thought. If you use an agent and look it act, that’s exactly what it does.
That’s more thinking than my dogs. Less than a human. And not physiological thinking of course, just a bunch of mathematical processing, but it’s very well capable of performing basic thinking.
It asks questions, provides answers, discusses those answers, drops them, and repeats. Still all mathematical processing indeed with a sparkle of randomness.
But it’s a train of thoughts.
Does it give any truth or reality to what it thinks? No.
Not true. It create independent train of thought. If you use an agent and look it act, that’s exactly what it does.
That’s more thinking than my dogs. Less than a human. And not physiological thinking of course, just a bunch of mathematical processing, but it’s very well capable of performing basic thinking.
It asks questions, provides answers, discusses those answers, drops them, and repeats. Still all mathematical processing indeed with a sparkle of randomness.
But it’s a train of thoughts.
Does it give any truth or reality to what it thinks? No.
Saying that dogs think less than “AI” “agents” is INCREDIBLY insulting to dogs. Like, holy fuck, dude.
– Frost
I have four dogs… I know what I am talking about.
Dogs think, of course, but usually get to better and faster conclusions than AI…
That’s why they think less than AI.