• fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Im surprised that the EU doesnt have a secuirty requirement for IT infrastructure in the food supply. Seems like an oversight

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We do, but companies are given a billion years to implement that because The Economy ™️

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There’s nothing as far as I know, even in industrial settings. Some companies are better than others, and some fields are better than others, but at the low level everyone does whatever the fuck they want. Always-connected teleservice routers and similar devices are everywhere, with outdated firmwares just waiting to be hacked. It’s improving but very slowly.

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Erh we have the NIS2 directive… requirements are skyyyyyy high for critical infrastructure which is surprisingly a lot of industries. Among other things vulnerability management is a topic companies subject to NIS2 must cover. Not saying that it cannot happen to have outdated crap connected somewhere but the exposure is getting fast smaller and smaller.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The problem as that these directives and standards are completely beside the point. They do manage a lot of security-relevant stuff, but in the end what’s hacked isn’t the documentation the standards require but the actual code running on the machine.

          And there’s pretty little that the standard can do against actual honest bugs and mistakes in the code.