I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Do I? I said that as long as those laws exist legal gender also has to exist. I didn’t say that those laws should or shouldn’t be removed.

    Most of those laws are passed by leftists governments and many were passed very recently. Those laws are how the left is trying to create gender equality right now. If you have other ideas you’re free to propose them.

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s a case of those laws need to exist, because of gender inequality, but when things become more equitable then it should be changed to not the removal but the widening of them

      All genders getting the same amount of (increased) parenthood leave, for example

      All genders being allowed to fight in wars if they want to. Nobody being forced to fight in wars.

      But the way you were wording it felt like you’re saying “THOSE DAMN FEMINISTS GET AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE”