I noticed almost everybody here agrees that all AI is bad, and anything produced by AI is slop. and refuse to use any software made in part or in whole with AI or help of AI? Please mention your background and usage of AI with your answer.

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    No idea.

    But not everybody is against ai. I am not. I am about regulating and find ethical approach to AI, which is pretty substantially different. I use ai.

    But those advocating against will always have a louder mouth. And it will be useless anyway, since ai is here to stay.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol regulating it just makes it so anthrhopic and openai have complete control and will likely make running local models illegal

      • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Running local models will never be illegal. But maybe regulating ai could help bring down the hardware cost, by limiting scalping and data center uncontrolled growth.

        And having cheaper hrdware would bring down the entry barrier costs and help make local ai more widespread

        • dragnucs@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’ve got a nice idea you should preach more. Government could impose a tax on data-centers bigger than a given threshold. Just like some countries have a luxury tax on some cars. this would make running very big data centers very hard and they would need some workarounds. maybe even have a cap limit on electricity usage in a region or a limitation like this.

      • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because of many, only a few complains usually. And the complainers usually have stronger beliefs (true or false, I am not debating here).

    • dragnucs@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree, everyone I meet IRL seems to agree on usefulness of AI. Even at work and our clients push forward to using AI to help speed up work. Results (speeding up work) are not always consistent but everyone at work uses it and everyone is happy with it. So it is here to stay.

      • graycloud@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you want to convince someone of something, you’ve got to convince them it is beneficial for them to do or not do what you want. Otherwise, it comes off like you’re trying to selfishly impose your own will onto others.

        If someone says that AI speeds up their workflow (which they need to live and remain housed), and your response is “but it’s bad for moral reasons” you’re saying that your moral reasons matter more than the other person’s ability to earn money… A better idea would be to try to make them see that an ai subscription is a waste of money and doesn’t actually speed up their workflow.