• GaryGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Go for it, they will choose the most inexperienced losers and it will blow up in their face. Like the doctored Epstein footage with the movie maker marks

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t they have voting machines every year at DEFCON?

    I feel like this is already been litigated.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Independent testing of voting machines and open sourcing the vulnerabilities in order to get them patched, is a good idea.

    Unfortunately, we all know what the Trump Regime actually intends to do: Keep the vulnerabilities in their pocket, and use them to secure “victories”.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s totally fine though. Since no one in America has the balls to do anything about it- it’s legal.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The land of the once free and somewhat brave, but it was quite a lag time ago.

      • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They’re the elephant that was tied to a stake as a baby

        They have accepted their fate and are resigned to being fucked over

        So they hate the people around them, rather than the cunts who put in the stake

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pillow magnate guy already got the inner workings of all the voting machines in 2020 and they reverse engineered them all from the swing states, likely all the red states too. GA I think, MI, CO, AZ, and so forth.

    It’s just one facet of their plans to rig elections (moreso.)

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Can’t wait for stories like this to suddenly just disappear in November when Republicans somehow - miraculously! - barely squeek out enough votes to secure key races at the very las second.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Lol… With this administration? They’ll probably just report that they recieved 10x whatever the other party gets and brag about how big America must be to get more votes than citizens.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And somehow, the polls will all be wrong and we’ll all scratch our heads how that happened.

      Must be because Republicans don’t answer pollsters! 🙃

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    This is an inherent flaw of digital voting machines. One has to trust their integrity which only can be confirmed by a few specialists. By design, that is a lot simpler to undermine than a system that relies on a huge number of people where almost anyone who wants to is capable of taking part in securing the integrity of the vote.

    No self respecting democracy should use them.

    • redballooon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Hey its 2026! just ask AI who should win based on popular vibe, and be done with.

      We call it vibe voting

    • Fribbizz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And, as a bonus, the old school method has a tremendously low error rate.

      I remember an article in a renowned computer mag about 20 years ago measuring error rates. The newest and greatest voting machine, at the time, still had way worse error rates than hand counting. Never mind everything that was around before. Maybe the most modern systems can achieve the same error rates as hand counting, dunno, haven’t been keeping up.

      I was absolutely floored with how bad the error rates of lever operated mechanical machines used to be. How anyone accepted those anywhere near a democracy was beyond me.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Of course they hacked voting machines to audit their security. Apart from that, voting machines can’t fulfill the transparency requirements of democratic elections on principle. So just not using them would be better anyway.

    • Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Exactly what we did in the Netherlands. Our “CIA”, the AIVD, researched the machines and found them susceptible to magnetic “eavesdropping” and therefore not compliant to our voting law. The Netherlands stopped using them since 2009. Source, dutch

  • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As much as I would want to cry foul, this sound like a typical red team exercise.

  • Havatra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Voting machines are vulnerable just like any other machine, and have been proven time and time again that they’re not particularly difficult to hack. DEF CON has been doing it for almost ten years at this point. First time in 2017, with lots of articles covering it. The year after even TIME reported about how an 11 year old did it. In 2024 they got some attention again due to Trump going for second term. But I don’t think much came of it…

    The US is a flawed democracy, and has been on a steady decline for years.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      funny how the machines are solelyused in only republican areas. in the west its all paper ballots. wether thats from mail in or in person.

    • Redfugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I worry that comments like this can degrade the confidence in the system.

      States run their own elections and they’re usually administered at the county level. I can’t speak for any other county but the way we do elections here are legit. This system is audited and administered by bipartisan teams. During elections I work with people from different parties and facilitate a system to ensure our voting process maintains integrity.

      If you don’t know how elections are administered where you live I encourage you to take an interest and get involved. We all have a duty here to oversee that we are administering elections with integrity.

      • Havatra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The system is made up of many components, and voting machines are but one part. Even though they might be hackable in various ways, there are much more efficient ways these days to sway an election. The Cambridge Analytics scandal proved one efficient way, while there’s now a growing belief that whoever controls the social media algorithm effectively controls public opinion.
        And don’t get me started on the two-party-system in the US…

        So no need to hack the machines, really. The system is flawed/corrupt elsewhere more severely.

      • story@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I’m sorry to say this to you. It wasn’t difficult to make a voting machine in 2011. What we have are fraud machines. It’s just politically impossible to make a secure voting machine, even though it’s technically trivial.

        • limer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Most democracies do not use voting machines because it’s impossible to trust anyone with creating and maintaining it.

          If there is a way to change the vote tallies, then clever people will use it to enrich themselves.

          The only way to circumvent most cheating is by paper ballots recounted manually in front of representatives of all candidates: recounted as many times as asked; and the ballots must be kept in public view until a winner is declared.

          Putting the ballots into any other device negates some or all of the above.

          And I would only have to say this in American political posts. But Americans are married to voting in ways that cannot be verified, except in some states. So most likely what’s seen as common sense in most of the world is either ignored or viewed with suspicion here.

          Ask any student in the uk though; and I’m just echoing what has been taught in school to young children

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The administration wanted a voting machine hacked, but DOGE had already fired the experts capable of doing it. Apparently the one thing stopping a potential election conspiracy was Elon Musk’s ability to make government incompetent at absolutely everything. Task failed successfully.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Normally vulnerability testing would be a good thing, but in this case I think it’s safe to assume the worst motivations for it.