• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s classic America. Have an overly complicated stupid system that doesn’t work, and is inherently unsafe, but don’t fix it because doing so would require some billionaire to lose a revenue stream.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That didn’t quite answer the question. I said county not country. I’m in America, elections are run at the county level usually.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Depends on the state/county contract. The ones they had in KY and PA didn’t provide any sort of paper backup when I lived there. They just seemed to be a touchscreen with a custom UI.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The US doesn’t have a system. Elections are run/supervised by the county and regulated by the state. That makes for a robust system that pretty much can’t be subverted, no single throat to choke.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Electronic voting has been compromised multiple times in the United States so that’s demonstrably untrue

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I think the point was that maybe a system gets subverted but because everyone does it different what you did in that state doesnt always affect every voting place

          There’s no 1 spot to cheat everyone.