Dismissing an argument is not an ad hominem. What an ad hominem is has been explained.
Just because I disagree with you means I must be wrong all the time?
You keep Inventing strawmen. You are wrong all the time because the things you are saying are wrong. For some reason you attach a personal relationship to that.
You are just wrong on this point and I clearly pointed it out. there is nothing left to argue so I’m just gonna smile at the stupid retort. Hope this helps you understand my position a little bit better.
By not addressing the argument they are dismissing it. Just because I disagree with you means I must be wrong all the time? Get over yourself.
Dismissing an argument is not an ad hominem. What an ad hominem is has been explained.
You keep Inventing strawmen. You are wrong all the time because the things you are saying are wrong. For some reason you attach a personal relationship to that.
marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad hominem
They simply described you, and you thinking that is an “attack on your character” is pretty revealing
Ad-hominem is not just a synonym for “insulting” you fucking idiot
Correct. And they are not marking your argument. Just like me calling you a dumbass genocidal fascist isn’t marking your argument.
Right so rather than address the argument at all they simply attacked my character… sorry that it’s a buzz word or whatever but that’s what he did.
When your character IS the argument, no one is ignoring the argument.
Wrong.
You really need to get better responses in order to justify your username
You are just wrong on this point and I clearly pointed it out. there is nothing left to argue so I’m just gonna smile at the stupid retort. Hope this helps you understand my position a little bit better.