• Lasherz@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    It’s the size of a dr. Pepper and the weight of 3 baby elephants.

    It’s also the size of a baby elephant foot and the weight of 728 cans of dr. Pepper.

    • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s fine and dandy, but what I really wanna know now is, to the size of how many Dr. Pepper cans can I compress 3 baby elephants and have that hold together?

      • 3 baby elephants, each about 100 kg is 300 kilogram. Round to density of water, so say 300 liter and ignore the chunks. One can is 0.355 liter. Round to ⅓ liter. That makes 900 cans. About one pallet low stacked pallet.

        • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Thanks for spelling that out, but maybe I need to be more specific about the assignment. In your example the elephants still consist of elephant matter. I wanna know what happens, if we’re allowed to change that on a nuclear level, so shift some protons, neutrons (and whatever other particles, that I know nothing about) around. How many Dr. Pepper cans is the currently known limit of physics here?

          • Say we change the mass of elephants to osmium. That’s 41 liter or 123 cans. That fills up about half of the bottom of a pallet.

            Say we chuck the elephants into Jupiter and let them sink to the core. That’s 27 liter or 80 cans. Roughly 3 cardboard trays of 24 cans each.

            Say we chuck the elephants into the center of the sun. That’s 2 liter or 6 cans, so a six-pack.

            If you use exotic matter things get silly. You’re not talking about cans anymore. 300 kilograms of neutronium is barey a micrometer in size. Black hole matter is smaller than a proton.