TL;DR: Self-Driving Teslas Rear-End Motorcyclists, Killing at Least 5

Brevity is the spirit of wit, and I am just not that witty. This is a long article, here is the gist of it:

  • The NHTSA’s self-driving crash data reveals that Tesla’s self-driving technology is, by far, the most dangerous for motorcyclists, with five fatal crashes that we know of.
  • This issue is unique to Tesla. Other self-driving manufacturers have logged zero motorcycle fatalities with the NHTSA in the same time frame.
  • The crashes are overwhelmingly Teslas rear-ending motorcyclists.

Read our full analysis as we go case-by-case and connect the heavily redacted government data to news reports and police documents.

Oh, and read our thoughts about what this means for the robotaxi launch that is slated for Austin in less than 60 days.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is news? Fortnine talked about it two years ago.
    TL;DR Tesla removed LIDAR to save a buck and the cameras see two red dots that the 'puter thinks it’s a far away car at night when indeed it’s a close motorcycle.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The argument is that humans can drive with just 2 eyes, so cameras are enough. I disagree with this position, given that the limitations of a camera-only system. But that’s what it is.

      Different sensors excel at different tasks and different conditions, and cameras are not always it.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s helpful to remember that not everyone has seen the same stories you have. If we want something to change, like regulators not allowing dangerous products, then raising public awareness is important. Expressing surprise that not everyone knows about something can be counterproductive.

      Going beyond that, wouldn’t the new information here be the statistics?

      • JordanZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        My state allowed motorcycle filtering in 2019 (not the same as California’s lane splitting). They ran a study and found a ton of motorcyclists were being severely injured or killed while getting rear ended sitting at stop lights. Filtering allows them to move to the front of the traffic light while the light is red and traffic is stationary. Many people are super aggravated about it even though most of the world has been doing it basically forever.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        like regulators not allowing dangerous products,

        I include human drivers in the list of dangerous products I don’t want allowed. The question is self driving safer overall (despite possible regressions like this). I don’t want regulators to pick favorites. I want them to find “the truth”

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Sure, we’re in agreement as far as that goes. My point was just the commenter above me was indicating it should be common knowledge that Tesla self driving hits motorcycles more than other self driving cars. And whether their comment was about this or some other subject, I think it’s counterproductive to be like “everyone knows that.”

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Why not? It’s got multiple cameras so could judge distances the same way humans do.

        However there have been both hardware and software updates since most of those, so the critical question is how much of a problem is it still? The article had no info or speculation on that