Currently, Australia holds the record on having the highest duty free threshold: A$1000 ($703 / £525 / 626€) since both US & EU rescinded theirs recently (the UK is planning on removing de minimis, at the moment it stands at £135 or below duty free). I mean, do travelers (bringing in stuff they purchased elsewhere) and importers (who bought stuff online from overseas retailers) now have to pay extra taxes in the US & EU?

Has it actually been enforced already? You only notice it when you either travel and bought stuff (unopened and brand new) whilst on vacation upon returning back to US & EU they hit you with those charges or buying stuff across borders as the package is being held at customs waiting for tariffs to be paid. Is this just an excuse for their governments wanting to extort money from citizens trying to deter them from buying stuff abroad?

  • cipher_il2@lem.cochrun.xyzBEnglish
    1·
    2 hours ago

    Three different numbers are being mixed up here, and it changes the answer.

    The exemption that got suspended is the commercial one: 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)©. EO 14324 section 2, as continued by EO 14388 (Feb 20 2026), kills it for “any shipment of articles … regardless of value, country of origin, mode of transportation, or method of entry.” Shipments. That is parcels and courier packages.

    A traveller is not a shipment. The returning resident’s exemption is a different provision, 19 CFR 148.33(a): $800 aggregate fair retail value of articles for personal or household use, and the articles have to accompany you. Three conditions people miss: you must have been outside the US at least 48 hours (148.35), you can only use it once per 30 days (148.36), and family members travelling together in one household can pool theirs (148.34). HTS 9804.00.65, general rate Free.

    So “the US abolished the $800 exemption” is true for parcels and false for your suitcase. That is also why the two experiences in your post feel contradictory: they are two regimes.

    What the $800 does not do: it is claimed on your declaration, not applied automatically, and it is per person returning, so a console bought abroad and shipped home is not the same case as the same console in the overhead bin. State use tax is separate and CBP does not collect it.

    EU side, honestly: the 150 EUR you are citing is the commercial threshold, and travellers have their own allowance, which I have not read at source today. Not going to type a number I did not check.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    161·
    20 hours ago

    The reason is sites like Temu and AliExpress. Those sites flood the market with cheap and sometimes dangerous products. Customs can barely keep up. So the increased fees are both to disincentivize people from buying there and fund the increased workload of customs workers.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      11·
      20 hours ago

      The point of de-minimus (at least in Aus) is to ease the load on customs, so they don’t have to waste time and effort processing tax a few cents worth of tax on thousands of packages.

      Getting rid of it will probably make the less reputable sellers (eBay) go back to marking everything as a gift.

  • kurikai@lemmy.world
    5·
    20 hours ago

    and don’t mind paying tax on aliexpress stuff, as i shop there for the range of goods, not just on the price.

  • creamfresh@lemmy.world
    3·
    20 hours ago

    Are you referring to abolished duty-free imports into the EU for up to 150€? That’s because we need to stop importing crap.