All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. “Another brick in the wall” hits stronger than ever now.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, but I don’t go blindfolded and I don’t have double standards. AI is the pinnacle of the system not a problem (get as much as you can from others without give something).

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      since when is “i will not contribute to worsening the system i am forced to be a part of” a double standard? people need to eat. they do not need chatbots.

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They don’t need a lot. They don’t need 3000cc cars, 2 closet of unused clothes, new iphone/android every year, etc etc. But guess what.

          • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The gimmicks I decribed are in the same category with the AI usage.

            Its double standard when your friend buys a new iphone every year, and you say nothing to him, but when they use AI you start the debate. Its based on stealing others countries minerals / work, and its bad for the planet.

              • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                No assumptions. This is how the modern society works. USA is 4% of the world’s population and consumes around 25%. And it is just a country.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  you’re making assumptions about people not saying anything, based on the (observed) behaviour of 4% of the population, and then, believing yourself to be the only one to either a) call people out and living as you’re learning, or b) not caring even a bit, take an assumed moral high ground which given a) is amazingly narrow-minded, or given b) is downright disturbing.

                  people do what they can, and they should be commended when they change for the better. a tool notably does what it’s designed to do, and should be criticised if that thing is bad.