• hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    IP rights are pretty awesome for a lot of engineers, writers and artists.

    Regardless, anyone who’s paywall can be defeated by a little JS switcheroo has dogshit for a paywall. If I have apple trees in my yard, and my fence is made of 7 or 8 sticks, when people stop by and snack on an apple, should I be mad at them or myself?

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sure, but it might be hard for NYT to make the case for that. All the browser fingerprint would say is “Chrome” and have spoofed data after that.

        I expect they did some trial and error to demonstrate what’s happening before filling a lawsuit over it.

        That being said, NYT just told everyone how to get free NYT. Best advertising Brave ever had.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Also, I think the NYT made it easy to bypass so they can pick up the non-savvy or richer readers who otherwise wouldn’t pay for something that is literally free, while still not limitting access and thereby reach. It might not be incompetence.

          It’s a hard balance to strike, because the best advertising for your paper is articles people send to each other. If nobody can read them, then nobody will become intrigued by a subscription, but if they are totally free nobody will bother subscribing.

          That’s why some sites have a certain number of free articles a month.