• Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 timer siden

    AI is a deep learning algorithm used for information retrieval with dubious accuracy.

    It doesn’t think. It has no awareness or understanding. It’s not intelligent. It certainly can’t come up with something new or creative like an intelligent person can.

  • KeithD@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 time siden

    They hooked some scientists up to some electrodes, picked the ones that glowed the brightest, and then made them take an IQ test. The AI scored higher. Some have suggested the scientists may have scored higher if they were removed from the electrodes first.

  • iampivot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 timer siden

    If the AI is so smart, why do they have to train it?

    Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientistsfuturism.com OpenAI CEO Sam Altman claimed that AI models are now smarter than top scientists, amid controversy over its purported math breakthroughs.

  • IamLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 timer siden

    These types of people don’t know the difference between having an answer and understanding. It’s why when AI solves a long running math problem, it’s practically useless to us.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 timer siden

    ‘Artificial Intelligence’ is, and always has been since the term was conjured in 1956, a marketing term for a pseudoscience.

    Anyone who is impressed by the function, or output, of a LLM, to the level they believe it is in any way adjacent to intelligence, must be quarantined from the decision making processes of systems which affect anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 timer siden

      must be quarantined from the decision making processes of systems which affect anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.

      So we should make them a CEO of a technology firm?

  • canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 timer siden

    If Sam believes that, will he replace himself with AI and retire already? Pretty please? … It’s so easy to catch the ultra-rich in their lies; they simply can’t be bothered to speak believably.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 timer siden

    The era of “Trump says” over, finally?

    Are we in “Altman says” for the next five years?

  • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 timer siden

    Now, lately. Specifically? Recently. Totally particularly, it happened on a certain date.

    Much wow

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 timer siden

    If it’s so smart, maybe they should ask it to come up with a viable business strategy, because he sure as hell hasn’t figured it out, lol.

    • isles@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 timer siden

      “We have no current plans to make revenue. We have no idea how we may one day generate revenue. We have made a soft promise to investors that once we’ve built this sort of generally intelligent system, basically we will ask it to figure out a way to generate an investment return for you.” - Sam Altman

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 timer siden

    Proper headline for anytime Altman and Musk make some statement: “Sociopath with too much money makes ridiculous claim.”