and instead shift my focus to reducing the power that the pile of shit elected would have.
No you wouldn’t, because this isn’t even a thing you can fucking do.
I think you’ll find that nearly everyone here agrees with you about ranked choice voting. I’m really not sure why you seem to think we are afraid of, or against it.
Limiting the power of the branches by returning the power to the people directly is what I’m talking about. If that seems vague, it’s because it is. That idea isn’t limited to any particular topic. Ideally the power would be so limited that it wouldn’t matter who’s elected to the position.
Are you in party leadership? The people in leadership are the ones afraid of it because it means giving up the duopoly.
No you wouldn’t, because this isn’t even a thing you can fucking do.
I think you’ll find that nearly everyone here agrees with you about ranked choice voting. I’m really not sure why you seem to think we are afraid of, or against it.
Limiting the power of the branches by returning the power to the people directly is what I’m talking about. If that seems vague, it’s because it is. That idea isn’t limited to any particular topic. Ideally the power would be so limited that it wouldn’t matter who’s elected to the position.
Are you in party leadership? The people in leadership are the ones afraid of it because it means giving up the duopoly.