• Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have literally bought a car once for less than this.

    (Used and pretty old, but still, a whole fucking car).

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How about two middle class cameras instead of 5 high-end, for a price point of 800 €…

    I mean, is this on purpose, so they can say “nobody wanted it” ?

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Completely wrong target for GrapheneOS. The GrapheneOS demographics, which I belong to, isn’t interested in high-end phones. They want a no nonsense simple phone with lots of storage and security first design.

    • fancy AMOLED screen: don’t care
    • 5 fancy cameras: don’t care
    • super powerful CPU and GPU: don’t care
    • storage space: yes please, I have photos and music to store locally!

    This will be harmful to GrapheneOS project. It will go like this: no one buys the phone because it’s too damn expensive and full of features the privacy nerds like me don’t care about. Even fewer buy the phone with GrapheneOS pre-installed and it’s a total flop. Motorola stops the partnership saying “we did it and no one wanted it”. No other OEM wants to partner with GrapheneOS after that.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah, still, id rather just go with a fairphone running linux. This whole phone and price tag is ridiculous, literally a monstrosity

  • 「黃家駒 Wong Ka Kui」@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    (slightly off on a tagent but relevent)

    i mean at this point, i feel like phones are just hostile, and computers are the last bastion of freedom in the digital world. run linux, connect to phone hotspot then you are free to use whatever encrypted programs you want, bypassing “client side scanning” or whatever bullshit they want to implement. like… from how i see it, google will eventually kill the bootloader unlock from pixels, and the vast majority of phones, even if bootloader unlockable, does not have relocking with custom keys and also lineage is kinda insecure (at least thats that seems to be the internet consensus), even if it might be more private.

    Phone should just be a “modem/router” thing, your gateway to the internet, the actual stuff should just be done on a portable computer. Australia already started a whitelisting thing for phone, its only a matter of time.

  • yxc999@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yeah no, even the 300-350€ (don’t remember it exactly anymore) I spent on my Pixel 9a were overpriced to me, I don’t even need half of the storage, RAM and CPU speed in here. We really need way less capable but equally as secure phones, who the fuck needs that much computing power to browse websites and write on Signal?

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    F*ck me, 2000 dollars?! I really wanted to give this a go, but def not for that amount of money

  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well … guess I’m still going to be stuck with used older pixels. There’s no way in hell I’m spending 1900€ for a goddamn phone.