• panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    But higher wages will increase the cost of living as employers raise prices to pay to for the higher wages.

    • Someone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have yet to hear of a business in which 100% of the cost to the consumer is labour. Materials, equipment, rent, profit margins, etc. all mitigate the impact of labour going up.

        • Someone@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not necessarily. If your labour is 25% of the cost of a product and it increases by 4%, the price of the product would go up 1% without affecting the profit at all (in dollars, not percentage).

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s better to let the free market determine wages. Wages are affected by the law of supply and demand. If a certain job is in high demand, the wage will go up. The government forcing wages up is artificially increasing demand.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      So, conversely, lower wages would make prices cheaper? By that token, I suppose you would be happy to have everyone’s salaries cut in, say, half?

    • Ravenheart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      This excuse always baffled me. You know they don’t HAVE to raise their prices, right? They could simply eat the cost and still be rolling in obscene amounts money. Let’s stop making excuses for corporate greed.