So killing is not okay except when its internet-approved vigilantism?

Example: “Polititian commutes death sentences” Lemmy be like “good”, but then when “Politician condemns assassination” Lemmy have a problem with condeming political violence?

(Like Gavin Newsom commutes all death row immates in California vs when Democratic polititians condemned Luigi Mangione)

Or are these different groups of Lemmings?

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    See Charlie Kirk’s murder. He wasn’t the state, he didn’t kill anybody, yet his murder is openly relished.

    I love how several of the commenters disagreeing with you just result in reinforcing your point.

    He disagreed with their “state”, so his assassination is celebrated.

    But, yea, this is the overall thread. For many, it’s a team sport and being on the right team means your murdering is OK.

    • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I love how several of the commenters disagreeing with you just result in reinforcing your point.

      It’s a flawed point, as many of those comments also pointed out.

      But, yea, this is the overall thread.

      People who aren’t perpetuating half-truths and whole lies like “Charlie Kirk disagreed with MAGA and Trump”?

      For many, it’s a team sport and being on the right team means your murdering is OK.

      Charlie Kirk did indeed cheer when ICE killed people.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kirk was OK with people being shot. “Small price to pay for freedom”. Bet he changed his mind right after he was the one. I do not celebrate his shooting, but I prefer him being shot over innocent people. And I know you understand that but decide to be a cunt. Don’t be like Kirk.