I read something about how he got therapy and then started weaponizing his therapy language to hurt his girlfriend, but from what I’m aware of, it’s more of a he-said-she-said thing, and people are generally on her side.
Just to clarify, and no shade meant, but when it comes to evidence he said she said is actually valid evidence. In many trials two people provide opposing testimony and the jury evaluates both and decides who they think is lying and who is more reliable. So saying he said she said is not really valid in a legal context, and when someone says something and then brings receipts in the form of message logs or supplemental evidence it becomes an evidentiary matter, not hearsay.
I read something about how he got therapy and then started weaponizing his therapy language to hurt his girlfriend, but from what I’m aware of, it’s more of a he-said-she-said thing, and people are generally on her side.
She has screenshots of everything she’s alleging. He says he didn’t say it. That’s hardly “he-said-she-said”.
You know more about it than I do, I pay as little attention to celebrity news as I can get away with
Yeah, I remember learning about this. It’s pretty fucked…
Don’t get me wrong though. It’s no where near as fucked as those other two on the poster, but still not great.
Just to clarify, and no shade meant, but when it comes to evidence he said she said is actually valid evidence. In many trials two people provide opposing testimony and the jury evaluates both and decides who they think is lying and who is more reliable. So saying he said she said is not really valid in a legal context, and when someone says something and then brings receipts in the form of message logs or supplemental evidence it becomes an evidentiary matter, not hearsay.
Thanks for bringing me into the loop, and yeah, I’m the same with celebrity news.