Except even the world revolution can’t solve the issue of degradation into a plain-old authoritarianism. Speaking in analogies, both communism and anarchism, as geopolitical regimes, create a power vacuum. A sterile room, ridden of all the bacteria, but neither of them has an answer on how to keep the room sterile after without having to overthrow yet another government.
[…] It’s also became heavily about surviving and overcoming an international system of capitalist power […]
As i said in my initial comment, both ideologies can work on smaller (than a geopolitical one) scales. Anarchism is already basically intrinsic to any friend/family group in some capacity. Help efforts, no matter whether they were started by ideological anarchists, exist, and nobody bats an eye about that. That’s just not what i’m discussing here. I’m discussing the realism of a communist and/or anarchist state.
Depends on the definition given. I’m not devolving into arguing about linguistics. If you didn’t understand what i was trying to say, then feel free to ask and I’ll clarify. If you did understand and are just being pedantic, while switching the topic of conversation, then it’s just rude.
Most anarchist movements agree on the statelessness of anarchist society. If you’re discussing “anarchist state”, you might have to lower your expectations of people taking you seriously. If you have not expressed your argument clearly enough, I look forward to clarification and correction of your precious comment.
Except even the world revolution can’t solve the issue of degradation into a plain-old authoritarianism. Speaking in analogies, both communism and anarchism, as geopolitical regimes, create a power vacuum. A sterile room, ridden of all the bacteria, but neither of them has an answer on how to keep the room sterile after without having to overthrow yet another government.
As i said in my initial comment, both ideologies can work on smaller (than a geopolitical one) scales. Anarchism is already basically intrinsic to any friend/family group in some capacity. Help efforts, no matter whether they were started by ideological anarchists, exist, and nobody bats an eye about that. That’s just not what i’m discussing here. I’m discussing the realism of a communist and/or anarchist state.
“anarchist state” is a self contradiction
Depends on the definition given. I’m not devolving into arguing about linguistics. If you didn’t understand what i was trying to say, then feel free to ask and I’ll clarify. If you did understand and are just being pedantic, while switching the topic of conversation, then it’s just rude.
Most anarchist movements agree on the statelessness of anarchist society. If you’re discussing “anarchist state”, you might have to lower your expectations of people taking you seriously. If you have not expressed your argument clearly enough, I look forward to clarification and correction of your precious comment.