Or is this just one of those things you’re not supposed to think too hard about?

(Edit) lmao, people who’ve never heard this mantra whenever you say that maybe there should be less suffering in the world… I envy you.

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is basically saying too much suffering is bad (succumbing to hunger). But a little (harsh breakup) can be good.

    Not quite, first off scale isn’t quite as relevant there, beyond a certain point can leave no room for revocation.

    Hypothetically a brain tumor can cause suffering, but the removal might rewire your brain so you feel better.

    Stepping on a lego may hurt… and most likely nothing of worth is gained from it.

    Suffering is always bad… the events afterwards can go either way. Even say the harsh breakup, might lead to personal growth, might lead to a long depression spiral that ends in murder or suicide.

    Also more important to point out, suffering isn’t required for personal growth. Maybe someone becomes a better person by going to therapy, or just watching someone be kind to someone else and being inspired, or falling in love with someone that loves them back.

    Suffering is one of many potential change agents per say. That change can be positive or negative, and again there are millions of change agents in the world. Suffering by definition is an unpleasant agent of change.