• BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, staying alive depends on eating. You don’t need a job to be able to eat - people survived for thousands of years without jobs and money.

    The fact that your argument only applies to pre human civilization era should give you a clue that it’s not a good one.

      • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The ones that don’t eat do.

        Others may try and get food by other means. For example some may go on the dole and get money from the government (which they have to pay taxes on). Some may become beggars and live in the street which is actually a lot of work and technically they have to declare that income and pay taxes on it. Some may resort to crime in order to get money and again that’s work and any money they earn is technically taxable. Some people may resort to prostitution in order to get money and again that is also work and is also taxable income.

        But the fact that you keep denying over and over again is that people that don’t eat die and that dead people are unable to work. Being employed depends 100% on being able to eat food.

        • FreedomAdvocate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You fundamentally don’t understand how any of this works. You’re beyond help. Bye.

          • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            No I understand that it’s not possible to work if you starve to death. It’s you who seem to be struggling with that concept.