HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth to Technology@lemmy.world · 16 hours agoThis is the technology worth trillions of dollars huhmedia.kbin.earthimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imageThis is the technology worth trillions of dollars huhmedia.kbin.earthHarkMahlberg@kbin.earth to Technology@lemmy.world · 16 hours agomessage-square168fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 hours agoSo if the AI can’t do it then that’s just proof that the AI is too smart to be able to do it? That’s your arguement is it. Nah, it’s just crap You think just because you attached it to an analogy that makes it make sense. That’s not how it works, look I can do it. My car is way too technologically sophisticated to be able to fly, therefore AI doesn’t need to be able to work out how many l Rs are in “strawberry”. See how that made literally no sense whatsoever.
minus-square1rre@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·7 hours agoExcept you’re expecting it to do everything. Your car is too “technically advanced” to walk on the sidewalk, but wait, you can do that anyway and don’t need to reinvent your legs
So if the AI can’t do it then that’s just proof that the AI is too smart to be able to do it? That’s your arguement is it. Nah, it’s just crap
You think just because you attached it to an analogy that makes it make sense. That’s not how it works, look I can do it.
My car is way too technologically sophisticated to be able to fly, therefore AI doesn’t need to be able to work out how many l Rs are in “strawberry”.
See how that made literally no sense whatsoever.
Except you’re expecting it to do everything. Your car is too “technically advanced” to walk on the sidewalk, but wait, you can do that anyway and don’t need to reinvent your legs