Neat breakdown with data + some code.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Net metering is great, much better than being paid for the surplus.

    With net metering the grid is basically an free, infinite, 100% effective battery.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Only while there’s a surplus. Our net metering arrangement effectively forfeits any surplus at the end of the year. It obviously can vary by region and how much you’d get from surplus vs specifics of the net metering policy, but I think getting paid for surplus is simpler and easier to plan around.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I disagree, but in not in your situation so I can be wrong.

        Unless you are producing way, way more electricity than you can use I think net metering is a great arrangement for the customer. (Not so much for the utility company)

        The electricity is usually bought by the utility company at a much lower cost than what the customer is paying. Because the generation cost is only a percentage of the cost, there is taxes, maintenance of the grid …

        For example in France we pay 0.1952€/kWh, but the utility is buying the solar electricity produced by household at 0.04€/kWh.

        Meanwhile with net metering your electricity is virtually bought at the same price as what you are buying your electricity for.