Why dont you make the effort to actually educat yourbcomrades instead of this barely good faith argument? It feels very different from the usual way of discussing things here. If you state something, prove it.
My proof is the entire pamphlet ‘The Russian Revolution’. She always critiqued other socialist/communist ideologies as a friend, not a hater and her arguments were never not atleast somewhat dialectical.
I think the wording “discredit” is not correct in this case. I don’t wanna discuss the whole Russian revolution analysis by Luxemburg, which she wrote in prison btw. But when I read the latter and also her works I always saw her as a critical friend. She was a Marxist and a Socialist and she would only formulate her critique from a place of admiration and sincere conviction. Her critique is never not out of a Marxist perspective.
Why dont you make the effort to actually educat yourbcomrades instead of this barely good faith argument? It feels very different from the usual way of discussing things here. If you state something, prove it.
My proof is the entire pamphlet ‘The Russian Revolution’. She always critiqued other socialist/communist ideologies as a friend, not a hater and her arguments were never not atleast somewhat dialectical.
I think the wording “discredit” is not correct in this case. I don’t wanna discuss the whole Russian revolution analysis by Luxemburg, which she wrote in prison btw. But when I read the latter and also her works I always saw her as a critical friend. She was a Marxist and a Socialist and she would only formulate her critique from a place of admiration and sincere conviction. Her critique is never not out of a Marxist perspective.