• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    uhhh, this has been a thing for a long time already. I don’t know whats new here. put about:profiles in your url bar for anyone uses a firefox based browser.

  • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Until it gets a proper Guest mode like Chrome (which is basically a private window without the shame of using one), the only thing they did is add a cute little interface to an ancient feature.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The screeshots shows functionality that the current profile/profile launch UI already has. Choose, create, ask on startup.

    Right now it’s hidden behind a startup parameter. But honestly, I would prefer a UI between the current one and the new one. That screenshot looks like it would reduce usability through big spacing and suboptimal alignment. At least judging by my preferences.

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-remove-switch-firefox-profiles?redirectslug=profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles&redirectlocale=en-US#w_start-the-profile-manager-when-firefox-is-closed

    I guess adding a picture is nice. But does it have to be that huge and prominent?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This only works on Windows. For Macs and maybe Linux, you have to run this command to bring up a different profile:

      /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox -p

      As best I can tell, there’s no way to make this into a shortcut that you could just click on. This change will be good and allow me to launch them without invoking that command in terminal several times after rebooting my computer.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          On Windows, I had two shortcuts–one each for a profile. It became my workflow and annoyed me when I couldn’t do that on a Mac. I didn’t always want my work profile to open by mistake, check into systems, etc. when I only wanted the home one, for instance.

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        In Windows it’s the same. Though the parameter is -P (uppercase) not -p. That’s why the comment said “it’s hidden behind a startup parameter”.

        As best I can tell, there’s no way to make this into a shortcut that you could just click on.

        I dont know about Mac, but in Linux you can just manually make a .desktop file to have as a shortcut to call firefox -P, or better a shortcut to a specific profile with firefox -P <profile>. Though what I often do is keep a bookmark to about:profiles and open a new window from there.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I might try this next time I launch. Just launch one, go into profiles, and launch the second one.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It was part of Firefox before Chrome was even a thing.

      Many people aren’t aware of firefox -P and/or about:profiles… but it’s one of the oldest features in firefox.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        I am.
        It’s annoying not just having a dedicated button like, for example, chrome has to manage profiles.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ironically, in the article it’s pictured running on Windows, which now has a built-in mechanic for automatically screen shotting everything you do and keeping records.

    Yay.

  • m3t00@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    tried tab groups, waste of time. trying to save my pinned tabs from disappearing. have to avoid closing single tab windows last. opens on the single tab and pins are lost. keep about 20 pinned in one window.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      pins are attached to the specific window. if you close the windows one by one it trashes them. use the quit function in the menu on the right, that it does not trash the windows, each of them will reopen next timealong with the pins

    • sleen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Agreed, it is tiring to type about:profiles each time, and then it auto corrects it to about:profiling instead.

        • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I can let my kids play on my computer without them screwing up my personal browser history or getting into any of my accounts without having to teach them how to use yet another extension.

          Vivaldi has a great example of profile management where I can literally create a desktop shortcut for each person that uses my computer, complete with their name, and it’s their own separate internet profile.

          Yes, I’m aware I could solve this problem by using multiple user profiles on my computer, but the overhead and the amount of management would also be a massive headache. It is just far easier to do this.

  • m3t00@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    have 4 default profiles. on latest, ‘Profile: default-release-3’

    about:profiles

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    ITT: People who only use Windows and don’t realize that FF works differently on other systems.

  • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think containers (that Firefox already has) are a much better way to handle this. Profiles, art least the way they are implemented on chrome, feels like a massive downgrade.

    • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It depends on how much separation you need. If you want different bookmarks, history, or settings per, then I believe you need profiles to make that happen.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can use containers all you want, just don’t create another profile and you’re golden.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        This is what I do now, just trying to figure out why ff keeps spending time on profiles. Do they have any advantages over containers?

        • SuperUserDO@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          For highly technical users containers are going to do everything we need.

          For non technical users who need separation, profiles are a standard known framework.

          • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My non technical spouse prefers profile to separate work and personal. She uses different themes for each profile so it is very obvious which is which.

            Also one of the extensions she likes interferes with a work site she is required to use. She has that extension installed in the personal profile but not work profile.

  • brianary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Zen has “workspaces”, which I don’t get at all. Profiles seems like too much, containers works fine for me.

    Crazy all the useless nonsense Mozilla has room for, since they helped kill RSS by dropping browser UI support for it for “simplification”. It was the same rationale for removing live bookmarks and Shift+Enter to add .net to an address and Ctrl+Shift+Enter for .org.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You can assign containers to workspaces so that you can use work stuff one workspace, gaming stuff in one and so on.