Internet providers may no longer have to itemize discretionary fees under the FCC proposal

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sale of product: $100

    Sale fee: $10

    Fee on Sale fee: $9.00

    Sale fee processing fee: $10

    Processing fees processing fee: $8

    Fee to aggregate these fees: $15.00

    Invoice fee: $10

    Invoice fee fee: $8.00

    Email sending of Invoice fee: $3.00

    Invoice Payment Fee: $30

    • FreedomAdvocate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They’re not mutually exclusive. Listing the fees is pointless if there’s nothing anyone can do about them.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The point is so people can see what fees they will get before making a decision to sign up so they can actually compare the actual price they will be paying.

  • calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This was passed during the previous administration, so of course they’re trying to get rid of it.

    “It’s not good for consumers it’s bad for business!”

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was playing this game long before Trump came around, didn’t lose once, got boring.

    When you see a headline that doesn’t include any mention of Democrats or GOP, ask yourself, “Do this law/proposal/regulation hurt people?” By hurt, I mean that it hurts more people than it helps. Don’t think I need to explain the rest.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Hurts consumers by taking away transparency in their billing. Why would they do this? How does this benefit the consumer?

        I’ve worked for a few ISPs, on the phone and in the field, can’t come up with an argument for this roll back being a good thing for anyone but the ISPs.

  • FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    What exactly is the point of making them list the fees anyway? So you can shake your head at the ridiculous fees, ask them to waive them, and they say “No”?

    Does it actually benefit anyone to have them all listed? Did it make them stop charging these fees?

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Why is it unreasonable to expect an advertised price to be accurate? If someone says your Internet will cost $30 a month, why should you accept paying anything more than that? A fair market helps increase competition, and is a good thing for all consumers.