• emmy67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all. Not saying it’s not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

      Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

        • FreedomAdvocate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

          So you can’t think of a single reason why anyone that’s not disabled would want to use AI on a computer? No reason anyone would want to use ChatGPT? Generate an image? Re-write some text? Summarise some text or a video? None at all? Really?

            • FreedomAdvocate
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Being baked into the OS means it can do infinitely more than a browser based one can.

                • FreedomAdvocate
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Being baked into the OS means it can access parts of the OS. Asking ChatGPT in firefox to turn off HDR on your PC doesn’t work. Using Copilot built in to the OS means it can.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all.

        Ok you’re so far down the anti-AI hole that you’re just being ridiculous. No point even bothering. “Disabled people don’t use Windows” lol One of the dumbest hot takes I’ve heard in a while.