SatansReddityUserName displays poorly disguised humiliation fetish
is this misogyny?
yes
i don’t agree with the mods there on some things, but I agree on this
Dude, you say extreme shit on Lemmy just to get a reaction. You got a reaction. Accept it. YDI
“But the evil leftists hate me when I defend Nazis and have casual misogyny! I’m the victim here!”
I… don’t understand any part of this interaction
Edgelord shits on female comic writer for reaction. Gets reaction. Is now banned from comm so uses it to come here for more reaction.
Talk about badly disguised fetishes…
Same here
Same. WTAF am I even trying to understand?
The same here.
Yeah same.
Criticism for a woman’s originally limited distribution but now leaked nude pictures in a context that didn’t mention or even tangentially relate to nude pictures, hers or others? I’d say that’s at least skirting misogyny.
Yeah it’s deffo a weird thing to bring up in relation to a comic
Ever been to the chippy on 23rd? Bloke sells the worst fish, and the cost! So have you seen the pictures of his weird cock?
A completely normal conversation with strangers for @SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
this analogy is definetly weird. but justifying mod action? idk.
however the author is a woman and for some reason i don’t understand, women get more backlash for things like that, often even from other women.
Depends. I’m willing to bet it’s not the first time they’ve skirted, you see enough of that shit and you’ve had it with their “i’m not touching youuuu” game
I can’t say I actually understand or care about this, but is hating someone misogynistic just because the person you hate happens to be a woman?
Nah, not necessarily, though I think bringing attention to their sexual activities when it’s not at all related to the topic is getting iffy. Then it’s a matter of why. Might be slut shaming, might be they’re just an arsehole, might be something else altogether.
Shouldn’t consider it completely unrelated. The comic’s last panel says “I will not indulge in your poorly disguised fetish.” That’s a sex thing. So the comic opens that domain of discussion by making use of it. Nudes are another fetish, so bringing them up in the already approached avenue is theoretically within the general context.
Also, no offense, but when discussing someone’s creations, unavoidably the person themselves also becomes a topic of discussion. Their past actions are brought up, in relation to the topic at hand or not. It is something we all do, whether we realize it or not.
Is it misogynistic? I’d say it borders on it as well. However, can we be sure this wouldn’t have played out the same had said nudes were of a man instead of a woman?
But I think in this case, the user themselves and their history are what triggered a permanent ban instead of a lower punishment, which in my view shows that the comment itself wasn’t really out of context after all.
Oh shit, I was looking for COMICS with nudes in them.
The first comic I saw of hers on Reddit was one where she was advertising her patron in the comic so there’s definitely some cross-over.
Well, I was disappointed to not see any Oglaf-esqe imagery. I’m otherwise not interested in leaked celeb images.
Are they leaked if you sell them and advertise the patron on every cartoon?
Didn’t look on her patron, so I wouldn’t know, but if I was the one selling them, I guess I would be the one leaking them.
SMCF, I generally enjoy your content, and had a blast looking through her comics regardless of the lack of drawn adult imagery. The announcement of her providing her nudes on her patron is a bit clumsy and I believe it led to at least two unintended interpretations.
