• muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Its all well and good to hate on the Bourgeois until you become one at which point the proletariat are your problem.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Its all well and good to hate on serial killers until you become one at which point the victims are your problem.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah but being a serial killer doesn’t add anything to society. Bourgeois ownership of property and the competition that creates (capitalism) put a man on the moon and given you a better life than the aristocrats the bourgeois overthrew. How many people have serial killers raised out of poverty?

          • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            The USSR never put a man on the moon. And what your implying here is that the USSR was communism? If so the genocides and mass starvation it caused should be enough evidence against communism.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sorry if I’m getting whooshed, are you being sarcastic? NASA is government-run. Feudalism was even more property-based and less democratic than capitalism is.

    • SteelEmpire@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So as long as the bourgeoise exist, there will always be a problem?

      Sounds like the only solution is to collectively agree to delete the bourgeoise.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        OK Marx sure. So what do u replace it with? Someone has to “own” ie control all the things and if u just hand it all over to some entity “the state” you have just reinvented aristocracy.

        • SteelEmpire@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Someone has to “own” ie control all the things

          That’s an extremely silly statement. Do you really believe in a single global landlord that owns everything that everyone else must pay rent to? If one person owns everything like you say, you just destroyed private ownership.

          You managed to accuse me of being both Marx and a monarchist all while you call to end any private ownership in just one post.