Just recently, I got banned from Lemmy.ml because they thought I was “trolling” using an LLM. Let me clarify to any Lemmy.ml mods reading this that I’m not using an LLM for my comments. I am a human being who actually has autism which is why I type like this.

Sometimes I post so much so fast that I get a “too many requests” error before I get to post the next comment - in these cases, that’s my cue to cool down for a bit, and then post my comments from my “queue” (I leave the comments unposted until I post them) after a certain period of time.

I just submitted a message like this on the Lemmy Matrix chat (through Cinny - pretty good software) as my ban appeal- I then got a reply saying “mods DON’T hang out here - just message them from the sidebar” which I will do after posting this.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would agree with that assessment, advocating for a two-state solution accepts the continued existence of the settler-colonial state. It treats the outcome of dispossession and genocide as a settled fact and asks Palestinians to negotiate within the framework created by that violence.

        • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I think any realistic outcome would entail an acceptance that the settler population will remain living on stolen land. The objective should be full parity among all current occupants, which is inclusive of the “right of return”, Palestinians moving freely throughout the entire territory.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                You started the deflecting, you started asking if advocating for a two state solution was zionism, then pivoted to ‘whats realistic’ when I said ‘yes, obviously.’

                Thats why my last post was actually completely relevant.

                • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You introduced Zionism into the discussion.

                  I question that advocacy for a “two-state solution” is necessarily Zionism, whereas your complaint rests squarely on such an assumption. The entire settler population being expelled is not feasible. Zionism should not be represented so broadly as to include everyone who is merely practical.

                  Your grievances about a thread from nine months ago obviously are irrelevant.

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    You introduced Zionism into the discussion.

                    It’s why OP was banned from other places.

                    The entire settler population being expelled is not feasible.

                    The link I posted has numerous people explain that advocating for the liberation of Palestine isn’t the same as advocating for a genocide or expulsion of Jews in Israel.

                    It’s not, and the fact that you jumped to that is why I respond in kind.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a sign that people got tired of your trolling.

        quoting a previous comment I made to you, re-iterating another comment made to you:

        you just sort of say your thing and move on, even if you pose yourself as seeking conversation. This is exemplified by how you constantly say the same things unprompted over and over even when not a single person has responded positively to some of it, and there’s no apparent effort to change what you’re saying to even account for that, even if it’s just presenting an argument differently (though normally you don’t even really argue, you just declare).

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        No it means you should get more than a western world view and stop parroting talking points of US Imperialism.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        The same question you have asked repeatedly, along with others, ever since your account appeared on Lemmy.